Saturday, December 19, 2015

Quantity Surveyour

quantity surveyor (QS) is a professional working within the construction industry concerned with construction costs and contracts.
Services provided by a quantity surveyor may include:
  • Cost planning and commercial management throughout the entire life cycle of the project from inception to post-completion
  • Value engineering
  • Risk management and calculation
  • Procurement advice and assistance during the tendering procedures
  • Tender analysis and agreement of the contract sum
  • Commercial management and contract administration
  • Assistance in dispute resolution
  • Asset capitalisation
  • Interim valuations and payment assessment
  • Cost management process
  • Assessing the additional costs of design variations
  • Production of company pre-qualification questionnaire (PQQ) documentation in line with company policies.

Traditional quantity surveying services[edit]

  1. Cost planning
  2. Estimating
  3. Contracts negotiation
  4. Procurement advice
  5. Preparing Bill of Quantities (BOQ)
  6. Monitoring Budget
  7. Preparation of Payment Invoice and certification
  8. Assessment of variations
  9. Dispute resolution
  10. Preparing feasibility studies
  11. Cost control
  12. Value engineering
  13. Advice on cost limits and budgets
  14. Whole life cycle costing
  15. Valuation for insurance purposes
  16. Project management
  17. Advice on contractual disputes
  18. Preparation of final account

Professional duties[edit]

Pre-contract[edit]

  1. Provide procurement and contractual advice
  2. Provide 'Order of Magnitude' costs for construction projects
  3. Refine, monitor and control costs during design development
  4. Prepare contract documentation
  5. Prepare pre-tender

Tender review[edit]

  1. Identify cost-risks in tender returns
  2. Prepare tender reports
  3. Recommend preferred tenderer
  4. Estimates tenure of the project

Islamic Architecture

These 2 articles are written by 2 professors, one from a non muslim perspective and the other from the Muslim perspective.
Karen Eva Carr, PhD.

Assoc. Professor Emerita, History
Portland State University

Greek Architects designed the first buildings in the new Islamic Empire; they had already been living in the area when the Arabsconquered it. Because Greek architects designed them, these buildings look a lot like earlier buildings in West Asia - Late Roman Empire buildings. But because they were now building Islamic mosquesand not Christian churches, these Greek architects were able to experiment with some new forms, developing a new Islamic style. One of the earliest mosques is the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, from the 600s AD. It's octagonal, like Hadrian's Pantheon, instead of being cross-shaped like a Christian church. In the late 700s AD, the new Arab rulers of North Africa and Spain marked their new territory by building great mosques like the one at Kairouan (modern Tunisia) and the one at Cordoba in Spain.

In the 800s AD, the Abbasid caliphs rejected the Roman identity and moved the capital of the Islamic empire moved further east, to Baghdad, and so the caliphs needed a lot of new beautiful palaces and mosques and university buildings built in Baghdad. Because Baghdad was in the old Sassanian Empire, the architects who lived there followed Sassanian architectural traditions, and these buildings, like the mosque at Samarra, looked very different from the ones built by the Greek architects. 

In the end, though, the Islamic Empire made it so easy to travel around that all the architects got to know each other's styles, and there got to be one main style of building all across the Islamic Empire, which was a mixture of the Roman and Sassanian styles. As the empire broke down into a lot of smaller kingdoms, the ruler of each kingdom needed to show how important he was, so he built mosques and palaces in his own capital. The Fatimids, for example, built the Al-Azhar mosque in Cairo in the 900s AD. In Spain in the late 1200s AD, the Almohads, built their own palace at Granada, the Alhambra. Even in northern India, people built mosques in an Islamic style, and even in West Africa, on the other side of the Sahara Desert.

The Ottoman sultan built the last great Islamic building before 1500 AD - his palace in Istanbul, which he built in the late 1400s AD. 




Introduction to Islamic Architecture


by: 
Islamic architecture encompasses a wide range of both secular and religious styles from the foundation of Islam to the present day, influencing the design and construction of buildings and structures in Islamic culture and beyond. The principal Islamic architectural types are: the Mosque, the Tomb, the Palace, the Fort, the School, and urban buildings. For all these types of constructions, Islamic architecture developed a rich vocabulary that was also used for buildings of lesser importance such as public baths, fountains and domestic architecture. The following article, recalling salient aspects of the rich tradition of Islamic architecture, provides a brief discussion on the concept of Islamic architecture and reviews a number of its key theoretical issues circulating in the Western academic circles.
Rabah Saoud*
Table of contents
Note of the editor
This article was first published in January 2002. An edited version with revisions is published here in HTML, with new illustrations and captions. © FSTC 2002-2010.
* * *
Although Muslim architecture has been widely investigated, it still remains omitted from main stream architecture theories and much of the existing works about it are no more than curiosities undertaken by a group of sympathisers. Here, the notion of Islamic architecture has been associated with Muslim monuments such as mosques, palaces, and castles. Some scholars, such as Briggs (1924), called it Muhammedan. Sometimes, it is denoted as Saracenic, a Crusaders' name for the Muslims. In some textbooks, we find deliberate silence, an example of this is Simpson‘s book, one of early key references of History of architecture [1]. This three volume work touched upon the architecture of most nations but jumped from Sassanian and Byzantine architecture (4th and 5th century CE) to European Medieval architecture of the 11th century (Romanesque), ignoring some 500 years of Muslim architectural achievements (700-1200). Hope (1835) provided a chapter on Islamic architecture entitled "Derivation of the Persian, Mohammedan, and Moorish architecture from that of Byzantium." The title clearly demonstrates why Hope referred to Islamic architecture. Meantime, publications referring to it often present a shy coverage. Kostof (1994), for example, gave it a mere eight pages with five figures in his 800 pages work [2].
Figure 1: The Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem is a key example of Islamic architecture. (Source).
Furthermore, there are views circulating in the West which reject the "islamisation" of architecture, arguing that Muslim architecture was used by Orientalists only to differentiate it from other types of architecture. This prejudice is often argued by the misconception of Islam‘s reluctance to building and urbanisation which circulates among some scholars. They propound that the nomadic lifestyle of the Arabs discouraged any form of permanent settlement and thus any architectural or building tradition. According to this view, much of the building heritage of what is called Islamic architecture came from Christian, Persian, or Indian origins and Muslims only imitated and sometimes employed masons from these cultures.
The answer to these arguments involves the following three main issues:
1. Although Islam opposes the exaggeration in unnecessary spending, it has no objection to comfortable life or wealth as such, nor to the enjoyment of this worldly life. Allah has subjected his creation to the use of his favourite creature (man), but man has to use it within the boundary of his Almighty‘s law and guidance, as it is clearly affirmed in a Quranic verse of Surah Luqman (31:20).
2. Sources on the tradition of Prophet Muhammad show that he discouraged Muslims from miserable living. It is amply evident that he had worn rich clothes in festivities and was fond of exquisite perfumes and essences. His famous expressive saying: "Strive for your earthly life as you live forever and strive for your hereafter as you will die tomorrow" sums it all up.
3. In relation to building activity, we find indications in the Quran as well as in the tradition of the Prophet that the first builder was Prophet Adam who built the Kaaba. After him, it was Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) and his son Ismail (Ishmail) who rebuilt it, after its collapse some 800 years before Prophet Suleiman (Solomon) built his famous temple, which is considered in some popular writings as the origin of architecture. The Quran also refers to building in a number of occasions. In Surah 66, Ayah 11, for example, the wife of the Pharaoh in her supplication says: "My Lord! build for me a house with Thee in the garden and deliver me from Fir'aoun (Pharaoh) and his doing, and deliver me from the unjust people". Prophet Muhammad participated in the construction of his mosque by carrying bricks. He also helped in the construction of dwellings of some of his followers. In one of his sayings, he stressed that "Whoever built a mosque, with the intention of seeking Allah's pleasure, Allah will build for him a similar place in Paradise [3]."
Figure 2a-b: Two views of the Abbasid Caliph Al-Naser Ledinillah Palace in Baghdad, built ca. 1200: (a) Main entrance door; (b) Muqarnas vaulted corridor. (Source).
From the above, it appears clearly that Islam has no objection to building and urbanisation. On the contrary, it requests the sons of Adam "to work and settle Earth if they are to fulfil their main divine purpose, as Allah‘s entrusted servants". As for borrowing from other cultures, we find the argument endorsing the universal concept of the message of Islam. Islam‘s accommodation and tolerance to other cultures have been its strongest point: "There is no difference between An Arab (Muslim) and a non Arab except by Piety" declares the Prophet. "Believers are but brethren" adds the Quran (49:10). In no other part of the world was the population so diversified, yet united, than in the Muslim World. This is the secret of the success story of Muslim art, architecture, science and technology of the classical period of Islamic civilisation. Its expansion over a vast territory, incorporating three continents, provided a cultural richness that played a significant role in the elaboration of Muslim art and architecture. Converts from Christian, Persian and Indian origins enthusiastically redefined their knowledge, as well as their experience in arts, industry and various accomplishments of their respective nations, to conform with Islamic values and injected it into their new world. Muslims were not blind imitators but "were content to adopt each local style that they found, modifying it mainly in distinctive ornamental details, but also introducing several important new features of plan and structure [4]."
On the other hand, early imitation or sometimes adaptation of non-Muslim buildings was deliberate, as these buildings were often communal centres for pagan societies. The early introduction of a completely alien architecture was not desirable, as Islam remoulded existing traditions and built on them the new value and life systems. So, these centres which played important community roles in ignorant pagan times, provided new enlightened rays of the new belief. The early use of churches in Syria and Spain, and temples in Persia and India is evidence of these attitudes. According to H. Saladin [5], the plan of the mosque was derived from older Semitic sanctuaries. Muslims have always maintained that Islam is a purification and renovation of Allah‘s old religion revealed to previous Prophets Ibrahim, Moses and Jesus. The building of mosques and diffusion of the new architecture did not take place until Islam became established in that community or region. For example, in Spain and Sicily, Muslim architecture clearly showed no connection with existing Visigoth and Lombard/Byzantine building cultures.
Figure 3: External view of the Alhambra complex in Granada (Source).
As Islam took firm roots and a degree of economic and cultural prosperity was reached, unique core architectural features, forms and techniques evolved. Such factors became distinguishing features of Muslim and Islamic architecture. Similarly, the existence of other elements unique to Christian or Japanese architecture would define their building style.
The second issue is terminological and connected to the use of "Muslim" and "Islamic" architecture. The two words are theoretically interconnected but conceptually different. Muslim is a general word referring to religious and geographical setting of Islam. Muslim architecture is the building style of the countries of Muslim religion, a term which may include modern or old architecture practised in these countries and which may not be necessarily Islamic nor display any known features of Islamic architecture such as the arch, the dome, stucco decoration, etc. Similarly, we say today Muslim city to refer to its location in a Muslim country rather than to its Islamic morphological features.
The other disadvantage of using this concept is related to buildings of Muslim origin but not in the Muslim world, as in the case of Spain, Sicily, old USSR and other countries. More positively, one can define it as including the architecture that was accomplished by Muslim masons, architects, for or under Muslim patronage (government), or in a Muslim country.
Islamic architecture can also be misleading as one may understand that it refers to the architecture of a particular religious (Islamist) group or that of a religious function, while in reality it refers to the Islamic way of building and the specific style developed in the civilisation of Islam. In this definition, we are not concerned with the location and actual function of the building, but rather with its Islamic character in terms of design, form and décor, a definition which includes all types of building rather than only monuments.
This is practical for the ordinary house as well as the mosque, the palace and other major architectural monuments. However, one can analytically categorise Muslim architectural achievements in two main areas involving religious and secular. The centre of the first is the mosque which was invented in the first year of Hijra to serve a prestigious role providing shelter and refuge for the first community of Muslims. The faithful gather there five times a day and every Friday on a weekly basis. The articulation of elements such as arches, domes and columns, calligraphic illustrations and geometrical decorating patterns create a continuous sense of peace and contemplation.
Figure 4a-b: The Great Mosque of Cordoba built by 'Abd al-Rahman I, and extended by 'Abd al-Rahman II, al-Hakam, al-Mansur, and Ferdinand III, between 784-786 and the 16th century (Source); (b) Floor plans showing the four phases of development: The first and second enlargements were made along the central axis, while the third enlargement was done to the lateral direction, which caused the position of the Mihrab not to be located in the middle of the Qibla wall. (Source).
Architecturally, the second most important religious building is the Madrasa (school), being in general a college which evolved from the mosque and was finally established as an independent institution of learning and education. The form of Madrasa progressively evolved starting from the simple form of houses of the teachers and reaching the monumental character of the Kutubiya in Marrakesh, Morocco. Here, the building incorporated lecture theatres, library, residential rooms for students and facilities such as bathes, fountains and a courtyard, which is equipped with a water clock. Although, a handful of Madrasas still exist today in the Muslim world, most of its teaching is undertaken by modern universities which do not structurally differ from their Western counterparts. Other religious buildings include monastic mosques (Zawiya) and mausoleums which can also be very elaborate, reaching sometimes a monumental position like the Taj Mahal in India.
Muslim secular buildings consist largely of domestic structures, palaces and ordinary houses. Here, one cannot stop appreciating the successful adaptation of space to religious values and teachings, especially those relating to private and public domains. From early palaces of the Ummayyad and Abbassid Caliphate to modern houses, there was much observance of distinction between private and public spaces. The first was designed for family and domestic life, reserved for children and women. In the palace, the public space was for conducting public affairs such as reception halls, meeting rooms, ceremonial courts (maydan) and mosques for princial entourage. Their setting, organisation and décor had worldwide reputation that they were made settings for many Western sagas and tales.
Figure 5: Ibn Yusuf Madrasa in Marrakesh, Morocco. (Source).
Other buildings that form part of Muslim secular architecture include military structures such as castles, forts, towers and walls. These were erected to provide protection for cities, especially in areas where external threat was menacing as in Palestine and its bordering countries (Syria and Jordan), in Cairo and North African coast. Giant gates forming part of the defensive system as well as elements of ceremonial furniture (victory) were also erected along these ramparts. The oldest of these is Bab Raqqa in Baghdad of Al-Mansur (in 772 CE) [6] and Bab Al-Futuh in Cairo (11th century) [7].
Muslim keen interest in trade produced highly developed architecture in the form of numerous caravanserais, warehouses (Qaysariyaor Khan) and suqs (markets and bazaars) which formed the economic heart of the Muslim city. In engineering architecture, Muslims managed to create ensembles of structures combining high degree of engineering, functionality and outstanding beauty. Their bridges, fountains and reservoirs also form fascinating elements showing sense of purpose and professional excellence.
Figure 6: The Taj Mahal in Agra, India, built by Shah Jahan as a mausoleum for his wife, represents the pinnacle of Mughal Islamic architecture in India and is one of the most recognisable buildings in the world. (Source).
Muslim architecture attests to the high level of power and sophistication that the Muslim community had reached at a time when Europe was living through the dark ages. Whether in the mosque, the palace or in the ordinary house, Muslim mason, architect and artist remarkably transmitted the profound devotion of Islam to community. The world owes much of its architectural development to early Muslim architects. Europe in particular built its architectural renaissance on the advances made by Muslim architects; a fact acknowledged at least in Gothic by a number of Western scholars including Fletcher (1961) who stated: "It is now generally admitted that European Gothic architecture owes a substantial debt to Islamic prototypes, many of which became familiar to the Crusaders in Egypt, Palestine and Syria [8]."
Figure 7: Kalan Mosque in Bukhara, Uzbekistan. (Source).
  • Creswell ,K. A. C. (1958), A Short Account of Early Muslim Architecture, Penguin Books.
  • Fletcher, B (1961), A History of Architecture: On the Comparative Method, The Athlone Press, London, 17th edition.
  • Hope, T. (1835), An Historical Essay on Architecture, John Murray, London.
  • Kostof, S. (1994), A History of World Architecture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hakim, B. (1986), Arabic Islamic Cities: Buildings and Planning Principles, Kegan Paul, London.
  • Saladin, H. (1899), La Grande Mosquée de Kairwan, Picard, Paris.
  • Simpson, F.M. (1913), A History of Architectural Development, Longmans, Green & Co. London.
  • Summarised Sahih Al-Bukhari (1994), translated by Muhammad Mohsin Khan, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Maktabat Dar Al-Salam.
Notes
[1] F.M. Simpson (1913), A History of Architectural Development, Longmans, Green & Co. London.
[2] See S. Kostof (1994), A History of World Architecture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[3] Summarised Sahih Al-Bukhari, 1994, p. 181. There are numerous sayings about building and making use of earth, e.g. Anas bin Malik narrated that Prophet Muhammad said: "There is none amongst the Muslims who plants a tree or sows seeds, and then a bird, or a person or an animal eats from it, but is regarded as a charitable gift from him" (ibid, p. 505).
[4] Fletcher 1961, p. 1226.
[5] See H. Saladin 1899.
[6] Creswell 1958.
[7] Bab al Futuh is a gate in the walls of the Old City of Cairo, facing north. It was finished in the year 1087. It stands at the northern end of Muizz Street. Its rounded towers were a stronger defence than the square towers of Bab al-Nasr (another Old City gate, just to the east). They had shafts for pouring boiling water or burning oil on attackers, and arrow slits. These gates and also Bab Zuwayla were built the powerful Fatimid vizier Badr al-Jamali, who ruled Egypt from 1074 to 1094, to prevent the attempts of the Turkoman Atsiz to take Cairo, among other threats from the East. See Bab al-Futuh on Archnet.
[8] Fletcher 1961, p. 1250.
* Dr Rabah Saoud, BA, MPhil, PhD, wrote this article for www.MuslimHeritage.com when he was a researcher at FSTC in Manchester. He is now an Assistant Professor at the University of Ajman, Ajman, UAE.

Karen Eva Carr, PhD.
Assoc. Professor Emerita, History
Portland State University

Thursday, December 10, 2015

Umrah (One year ago)

Today, last year, the family, except for Abang Long and Abang Ngah, went for umrah.

We hope that we could send the two for that mini pilgrimage. Abang Long is into his fourth month at Frank Knight, and Abang Ngah will start his one month stint at Politeknik Shah Alam on the 21st December.

Maybe next year, insha allah.

Saturday, October 3, 2015

Seri Menanti

"SERI YANG MENANTI"


Oleh : YM Dr. Raja Nafida binti Raja Shahminan
Pusat Kajian Alambina Melayu (KALAM) Universiti Teknologi Malaysia






PENGENALAN


Tujuan kertas kerja ini dibentangkan adalah untuk memperkenalkan ISTANA LAMA SERI MENANTI ke mata masyarakat memandangkan usia istana lama ini telah pun menjangkau seratus tahun. Keistimewaan istana ini patut diketengahkan kerana beberapa perkara iaitu :-




Istana lama ini merupakan ikon senibina Negeri Sembilan dari dahulu sehingga kini.
Istana ini tidak terikat kepada sistem Adat Perpatih walaupun hampr keseluruhan masyarakat Negeri Sembilan adalah pendukung Adat Perpatih.
Istana ini telah diwartakan sebagai Warisan Kebangsaan maka keunikan senibinanya harus dipelihara dengan teliti.


ASAL USUL SERI MENANTI


Terdapat beberapa versi berbeza mengenai asal asal Seri Menanti yang telah dikumpulkan diantaranya :-




1. Seri Menanti dibuka oleh Datuk Panglima Karu yang juga dikenali sebagai Panglima Hitam dari Pagar Ruyung, Sumatera dengan dibantu oleh tiga orang pengekiutnya iaitu Jaafar Kubis serta dua orang asli yang terdiri dari Batin Menggalang dan seorang lagi yag tidak diketahui namanya. Kedatangan Datuk Panglima Karu tersebut adalah untuk mencari tempat untuk dibuat negeri yang baru. Apabila menjumpai tempat yang difikirkan sesuai, mereka mula menebang, menebas dan membersihkan kawasan sehingga menjumpai sebatang pokok Merbau. Di bawah pokok Merbau ini mereka menjumpai serumpun padi yang baru tumbuh dari jenis Serengah Kuning. Oleh kerana, pokok merbau ini besar, kerja menebang dan mengambil masa yang lama iaitu sehingga padi Serendah Kuning itu masak dan anjing yang dibawa turut beranak, enam bulan lamanya. Pokok Merbau tersebut hujungnya sampai ke Sungai Ujong manakala pangkalnya boleh diduduki oleh 32 orang. Datuk Panglima Karu kemudiannya menamakan tempat tersebut MERBAU ANJING BERANAK PADI SEDIA MENANTI. Nama tersebut kemudiannya ditukar menjadi Seri Menanti (seperti yang tercatat dalam buku perasmian Masjid Diraja Tuanku Munawir susunan Tuan Haji Mohd Zain bin Hamzah)




2. Dipercayai bahawa ramai orang-orang dari daerah Minangkabau yang menuju ke Siak menyeberang Selat Melaka ke Johor, singgah di Melaka lalu ke Naning dan Rembau dan akhirnya Seri Menanti (pada masa tersebut belum bernama).Setelah ramai yang datang, ketua dari setiap suku telah bermesyuarat untuk mencari tempat yang sesuai bagi penempatan dan bercucuk tanam. Dato' Putih yang juga seorang pawang telah menjumpai rumpun padi yang aneh lalu tempat itu dinamakan PADI MENANTI. (seperti yang tercatat dalam buku perasmian Masjid Diraja Tuanku Munawir susunan Tuan Haji Mohd Zain bin Hamzah)




3. Asal usul Seri Menanti bermula dari peristiwa seorang isteri yang bernama Seri yang menanti kepulangan suaminya. Oleh kerana terlalu lama menanti, orang-orang kampung telah menamakan tempat tersebut SERI MENANTI. (Menurut fakta menemubual bersama Norhalim bin Ibrahim, 1993)




4. Nama Seri Menanti diambil sempena nama anak sungai yang hulunya di sebuah bukit antara daerah Kuala Pilah dan Rembau dan mengalir masuk ke Sungai Muar. (Catatan R. J. Wilkinson).


Walau apapun asal nama Seri Menanti, yang pastinya sebuah istana kayu telah lama dibina dan bagi saya inilah SERI yang setia dan sedia MENANTI kita membongkar segala rahsianya.






ISTANA-ISTANA SEBELUM DAN SELEPAS ISTANA LAMA SERI MENANTI


Istana-istana ini terletk di Seri Menanti yang kemudiannya menjadi Pekan Diraja Seri Menanti. Kesemua istana sebelum terbinanya Istana Lama Seri Menanti mempunyai skil yang kecil seperti rumah-rumah biasa, Tetapi oleh kerana yang mendiaminya adalah raja yang memerintah maka rumah tersebut dipanggil istana.


1. ISTANA BARONG-BARONG
Istana ini dikenali juga sebagai Istana Empat Tiang dan terletak di Ampang Rambai. Jarak kawasan ini dengan Istana Seri Menanti sekarang adalah lebih kurang 0.75km. Perkataan Barong-Barong itu sebenarnya bermaksud pagar rumah. Ini berkemungkinan hanya istana tersebut sahaja pada ketika itu dibina disekelilingnya. (Temubual bersama Ustaz Mahmud Talib, 1993).




2. ISTANA BARUH Istana ini dibina atas titah Yamtuan Antah kerana istaa Barong-barong telah terlalu uzur. Istana ini terletak bersebelahan dengan kawasan pemakaman Diraja sekarang ini. (Temubual bersama Ustaz Mahmud Talib, 1993).




3. ISTANA PULIH
Tidak diketahui bila tarikh sebenar istana ini mula dibina tetapi ia dibina di atas tapak Pusat Kesihatan Kecil Seri Menanti sekarang ini. Ada cerita yang mengatakan bahawa nama asal istana ini diambil dari keturunan POLICE dan ada yang mengatakan ia dari perkataan PALACE. Menurut catatan sejarah istana ini telah dibakar oleh pihak British pada Disember 1875 sewaktu perang menentang pasukan Yamtuan Antah. (Temubual bersama Ustaz Mahmud Talib dan Dato' Akhir Zaman, 1993).




4. ISTANA LAMA SERI MENANTI
Istana telah diilhamkan oleh Tuanku Muhammad Shah ibni Almarhum Yamtuan Antah dan mula dibina pada 5 November 1902. Baginda bersemayam di istana ini mulai tahun 1908 sehingga tahin 1930.




5. ISTANA BESAR SERI MENANTI
Pengaruh British merubah senario senibina tradisional tanahair. British telah memperkenalkan senibina kolonial yang menjanjikan ruang-ruang yang lebih luas dan selesa ditambah dengan kemudahan-kemudahan seperti tandas yang lebih bersih membuatkan senibina yang baru diperkenalkan ini mudah diterima. Masyarakat memandang tinggi kepada kemajuan yang dibawa oleh Inggeris dan menganggap bahawa pembaharuan ini adalah satu pemodenan. Tuanku Muhammad berpindah ke istana baru ini yang terletak berhampiran dengan Istna Lama Seri Menanti pada tahun 1930 dan bersemayam di situ sehinggalah kemangkatan beliau dalam tahun 1933.


Istana ini juga telah menjadi tempat bersemayamnya Yang Dipertuan Besar Negeri Sembilan selepas Tuanku Muhammad sehingga kini.






KRONOLOGI PERUBAHAN FUNGSI ISTANA LAMA SERI MENANTI


Sejak ditinggalkan oleh TuankuMuhammad pada tahun 1930, istana ini pernah digunakan sebagai :-




Kediaman rasmi putera puteri baginda selama beberapa tahun lamanya.
Rumah rehat kepada tetamu rasmi seperti raja-raja, sultan-sultan serta pembesar-pembesar yang datang ke Seri Menanti.
Pada tahun 1959, istana ini telah dijadikan sebuah sekolah agama rendah dan menengah tinggi. Penubuhan dan pelaksanaanya telah dibuat atas daya inisiatif dan usaha Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Sembilan pada masa itu. ((Temubual bersama Ustaz Mahmud Talib, 1993, bekas guru besar agama rendah).
Dijadikan sebagai Muzium Diraja di bawah penjagaan Lembaga Muzium Negeri Sembilan.


Beberapa perubahan telah berlaku sejak istana ini dibina diantaranya adalah :-


i.Tangga telah ditambah


ii. Bilik air telah diperkenalkan


iii. Atap telah diganti


iv. Landskap (termasuk pagar, pokok dll) yang asyik berubah-ubah


v. Perigi telah tertimbus ?


vi. Balai telah tiada?




SENIBINA ISTANA LAMA SERI MENANTI


Disebabkan pada masa tersebut British telah bertapak dalam sistem pentadbiran kerajaan, bangunan istana yang akan dibina ini harus mempunyai set lukisan lengkap. Rekabentuk bangunan Istana Lama Seri Menanti ini telah diperhalusi dan set lukisan lengkapnya telah disediakan oleh Mr. Woodford yang merupakan Ketua Pelukis Pelan dari Jabatan Kerjaraya, Seremban. Pelan tersebut kemudiannya ditandatangani oleh Mr. Gosgrove, Jurutera Negeri dan Mr. D. H. Wise, Residen British pada masa itu pada tahun 1902. Tham Yong, seorang kontraktor telah diberi kepercayaan untuk membina istana ini. Beliau dibantu oleh tukang-tukang cina dalam melaksanakan pembinaan ini.


Istana Lama Seri Menanti merupakan istana kayu setinggi empat tingkat dan proses pembinaannya hanya menggunakan sistem tangam dan pasak yang merupakan cara pembinaaan yang diamalkan oleh masyarakat pada masa itu. Kayu yang digunakan adalah kayu Penak yang diambil dari Hutan Pergai di Jelebu.


Istana ini mempunyai empat batang tiang seri yang terletak di bahagian tengah bersaiz 340mm x 340mm (13.5 inci x 13.5 inci) setiap satu. Ketinggian tiang seri ialah 51 kaki (16.7cm) dari aras tanah. Jumlah kesemua tiang yang terdapat pada istana ini adalah sebanyak 121 batang di mana 74 batang tiang terdapat pada bangunan utama istana manakala 47 batang tiang lagi terdapat pada jambatan dan rumah dapur istana. Kesemua tiang tersebut mempunyai saiz yang sama iaitu 190mm x 190mm (7,5 inci x 7.5 inci).


Istana ini mempunyai banyak persamaan dengan rekabentuk rumah di sekitarnya. Persamaan ini nampak ketara bumbungnya. Istana ini menggabungkan pada rekabentuk bumbung panjang dan bumbung piramid. Bumbung panjang menggunakan satu perabung lurus yang merentasi dari satu sisi ke sisi rumah yang satu lagi.


Manakala bumbung piramid pula menggunakan empat perabung yang mencuram ke empat bahagian penjuru. Bumbung piramid terdapat pada hujung kiri dan kanan dan juga di anjung istana ini. Ia mempunyai kecerunan yang sesuai untuk membolehkan air hujan mengalir dengan sempurna.


Kayu berlian digunakan sebagai bahan atap. Unjuran cucur atap bertindak sebagai penangkis cahaya panas dan penghalang tempias hujan agar tingkap masih berupaya dibuka dalam keadaan hujan yang sederhana lebat. Kedua-dua hujung bumbung panjang jelas kelihatan melentik sedikit sama seperti kebanyakan rumah yang terdapat di Negeri Sembilan.




i. RUANG-RUANG DALAM ISTANA


Konsep pembahagian ruang dalaman istana ini dibahagikan kepada 3 bahagian iaitu ruang persendirian atau ruang peribadi, ruang separa umum dan ruang umum. Melihat kepada pelan istana ini, ruang-ruangnya adalah lebih kepada ruang peribadi disebabkan ia adalah tempat bersemayamnya Tuanku Muhammad dan ruang-ruang ini digunakan oleh kerabat Diraja sahaja. Ruang peribadi ini terletak di tingkat satu, dua dan tiga di mana terletaknya ruang beradu dan ruang keluarga.


Ruang separa umum terdapat di istana satu digunakan oleh kerabat diraja dan orang-orang istana seperti Dato'-Dato' adat dan ruang ini adalah ruang serambi dan anjung istana. Ruang bawah istana dan ruang dapur juga merupakan ruang separa umum dan hanya orang-orang tertentu sahaja dibenarkan masuk ke ruang ini.


Ruang umum terletak di kawasan halaman istana dan ia adalah terbuka kepada masyarakat di sekeliling. Ruang ini tidak berpagar dan hanya ditandakan sempadannya oleh pokok-pokok besar sebagaimana menjadi kelaziman masyarakat dahulu.


Walau bagaimanapun, masyarakat sekeliling tidak akan masuk sewenang-wenangnya ke kawasan ini disebabkan oleh rasa hormat mereka kepada Tuanku dan kerabat baginda.




ii. HIERAKI RUANG


Dari segi susunatur ruang, adab dan tertib amalan kehidupan memerintah berstatus raja jelas terpapar dalam konsep hieraki ruang dan perletakannya. Istana ini dibina simetri dan dapat dilihat dengan jelas dari pandangan tampak hadapan dan pada lukisan pelan.


Ruang pada tingkat paling atas iaitu tingkat keempat adalah ruang penyimpanan khazanah Diraja. Ruang tingkat keitga adalah tempat bersemayam dan beristirehat Tuanku Muhammad. Tingkat kedua menempatkan ruang beradu Tuanku Muhammad, ruang keluarga dan ruang beradu Tuanku Ampuan manakala tingkat pertama adalah untuk ruang-ruang mengadap, ruang persada, ruang beradu putera dan puteri dan juga dapur. Istana ini dibina di atas tetiang yang berketinggian lebih kurang 12 kaki dari aras tanah. Ruang aras bawah hanyalah ruang kosong yang menampakkan tetiang bangunan. Peletakan ruang-ruang yang terdapat di setiap tingkat menunjukkan bahawa bilangan dan fungsi ruang semakin berkurangan di tingkat atas. Elemen privasi dalam menterjemahkan aspek pengasingan lapisan fungsi dan batasan pergerakan dimanifestasikan dengan kukuh.




iii. UKIRAN DAN ORNAMEN


Ukiran pada istana ini hanya boleh didapati pada bahagian tiang, pintu, dinding dan lambai-lambai. Corak dan motif yang terdapat pada ukiran ini kebanyakannya meruapakan corak pengukiran tempatan dan sebahagiannya dikenali sebagai Awan Berarak, Itik Pulang Petang, Ayam Berlaga, Bunga Matahari, Bunga Teratai dan sebagainya. Namun begitu, terdapat juga pengaruh Cina pada ukiran-ukiran ini dan ia dapat dilihat pada ruang pangkal serambi yang memperlihatkan ukiran berbentuk kepala singa, kaki kuda dan kuda beserta ekor yang panjang. Selain daripada itu, bentuk-bentuk abstrak dan geometri juga turut digunakan seperti potong wajik atau potong intan dan swastika. Terdapat sebanyak 48 tiang yang berukir dengan ukiran tebuk timbul pada bahagian hadapan dan sisinya. Selain pada tiang terdapat juga ukiran pada papan penutup bendul di sekeliling anjung yang sangat unik motifnya dan pada lambai-lambai di atas pintu.




KEISTIMEWAAN ISTANA LAMA SERI MENANTI


Istana ini dibina oleh tukang yang peka terhadapa keperluan fungsi istana dan istana ini dibina dengan menitikberatkan hampir setiap aspek penting seperti cuaca, fungsi ruang, adat, budaya dan kepercayaan.




Jika dilihat dari segi skala, istana ini mempunyai skala yang jauh lebih besar dari bangunan-bangunan yang dibina sebelum dan seangkatan dengannya. Diperbuat daripada kayu yang berkualiti keseluruhannya dan adalah sesuatu yang mengkagumkan apabila difikirkan ia dibina sewaktu ketiadaan pertukangan moden.
Istana ini mempunyai pelan dan tampak hadapan yang simetri manakala rumah tidak dibenarkan mempunyai pelan dan tampak hadapan yang simetri.
Ukiran pada bangunan istana ini bukannya ukiran Melayu sejati tetapi mempunyai pelbagai pengaruh luar.
Pada rumah pembesar-pembesar dan orang-orang berada pada waktu tersebut, serambi terdiri daripada serambi hujung, serambi tengah dan serambi pangkal. Serambi yang paling hampir dengan tangga dipanggil serambi pangkal manakala yang jauh dari tangga dipanggil serambi hujung. Serambi hujung ini lazimnya terletak di sebelah kanan apabila kita mengadap ke rumah tersebut. Tetapi pada Istana Lama Seri Menanti, serambi pangkal terletak di sebelah kanan apabila kita mengadap ke istana tersebut manakala serambi hujung terletak di sebelah kiri.


PERSOALAN-PERSOALAN YANG BELUM TERUNGKAI


Beberapa persoalan masih lagi belum terurai sejak kami memulakan kajian mengenai Istana Lama Seri Menanti ini pada tahun 1993. Ini adalah disebabkan oleh tiadanya dokumentasi yang boleh dirujuk dan ketiadaan orang-orang tua yang masih mengingati suasana istana ini pada waktu dahulu. Diantara persoalan tersebut adalah :-




Adakah takhta kencana Tuanku dan Raja Muda yang terletak di serambi istana (kiri dan kanan) wujud sejak dari zaman Tuanku Muhammad? Mengapakah takhta kencana Tuanku in terletak di serambi pangkal (sebelah kiri)?
Boleh dikatakan kesemua bahan rujukan mengatakan bahawa istana ini mempunyai 99 batang tiang tetapi dari kajian kami didapati jumlah kesemua tiang yang terdapat pada istana ini adalah sebanyak 121 batang di man 74 baang tiang terdapat pada bangunan utama istana manakala 47 batang tiang lagi terdapat pada jambatan dan rumah dapur istana.
Bolehkah senibina Istana Lama Seri Menanti ini dikatakan mirip senibina Minangkabau? Ini adalah disebabkan oleh senibina Minangkabau mempunyai bumbung bergonjong manakala senibina Istana Lama Seri Menanti mempunyai bumbung yang lentik.


KESIMPULAN : APAKAH 'SERI' AKAN TERUS MENANTI?


Telah sampai masanya untuk kita sama-sama memikirkan masa depan istana ini. Kemana arah tuju yang ingin kita bawa. Istana ini merupakan ikon senibina yang harus diberi perhatian sewajarnya dari kesemua pihak. Tanggungjawab harus dipikul bersama.


Keistimewaan istana ini adalah pada senibinanya. Senibina mencerminkan gaya hidup dan istana ini adalah bukti jelas dan nyata tentang kehidupan 'seorang' Raja yang memerintah. Walaupun cara hidup sentiasa berubah tetapi istana ini tidak seharusnya turut berubah. Masa harus dibekukan pada zaman pemerintahan Tuanku Muhammad. Tidak seharusnya ada sebarang penambahan yang boleh menghilangkan seri istana ini.


Kehadiran istana ini juga berkait rapat dengan persekitarannya juga harus dipelihara. Landskap termasuk pemilihan pokok, pagar, wakaf/pavillion dan bangunan-bangunan yang berhampiran adalah faktor yang boleh merosakkan seri istana ini sekiranya tiada kajian terperinci dijalankan mengenainya sebelum ia diubahsuai.


Tanggungjawab membawa istana ini ke tempoh hayat abad keduanya akan dipertanggungjawabkan ke atas pasukan pengurusan yang diharap dapat ditubuhkan. Peruntukan kewangan yang mencukupi, konsisten dan berterusan sudah pastinya akan memberikan kekuatan kepada kumpulan pengurusan ini.


Tempoh satu ratus tahun kedua bagi Istana Lama Seri Menanti tidak seharusnya dibataskan kepada kerja-kerja penjagaan dan pemeliharaan rutin. Tangungjawab sebegini tidak perlu diulang sebut kerana sudah tentulah bangunan seusia dan sepenting ini memerlukan penjagaan rutin yang cekap dan konsisten. Apa yang diharapkan dari kumpulan pengurusan berkenaan adalah meletakkan bangunan istana ini ke satu tahap luar biasa melangkaui sempadan negeri dan negara.


Kewujudan, kepentingan dan keistimewaannya perlu dicanang ke serata antero dunia sehingga warga dunia bagaikan merasa kerugian sekiranya tidak datang bertandang dan menyaksikan kehebatan senibina istana ini. Biarlah Istana Lama Seri Menanti ini terus menjadi penghubung antara generasi dan tradisi zaman silam, era sekarang dan masa depan. Sebagaimana bersungguh-sungguhnya dimahukan kemajuan dan modenisasi pada era sekarang maka begitu jugalah harapannya diletakkan di bahu setiap warga ini dalam mempertahankan dan melindungi pusaka budaya bangsa yang sudah menjadi warisan zaman berzaman.






Sekian, terima kasih.




Penghargaan ditujukan kepada




PUSAT KAJIAN ALAMBINA MELAYU, PROF MADYA TUAN SYED AHMAD ISKANDAR BIN SYED ARIFFIN dan
ENCIK IBRAHIM BIN ABDUL LATIF
yang telah bersama-sama memberi sumbangan idea dalam menghasilkan kertas kerja ini.